Thursday, March 6, 2008

The necessity of proof lies with he who complains

It was a human void. A vast plain of existence that had no observer. Then again, such a thing cannot exist because it lacks the very thing which creates existence. There logically needs to be an observer in order for anything to exist. Following that line of logic there must be an observer at every point in time in order for that point in time of existence to exist. Existence. What is the reason for our Existence? Do we live to find a higher purpose? Is our life just one stage of our Existence? Can God exist, and if he can, does he?

Throughout my life I have spent much and maybe even most of my time trying to figure out one unthinkable complexity after another. Just as many others do and have done, I feel I have a comfortable grasp on a philosophy that changes effectively as I gain experiences. But through my researching, my searching, and my reasoning I have found there is always something new to be learned, to be factored in the complex calculation, and to be used to think about previously determined situations in a whole new way. The main purpose of my writing is to eventually create a network of ideas, thoughts, and perceptions that will create and recalculate a totally new philosophy, one that only could have been thought up by well communicated experience and wisdom. This network of ideas will be unlike any other because only substantial reasoning and logic will be used to find a working conclusion, answer, or solution.

Religion, God, existence, life, holy books, thought, choice, myths, signs, signals, evil, good, doubt in faith, faith, fear, .... will be the topic of conversation, and we may hopefully create a philosophy people can be whole-heartedly supportive of.

Through a lot of research, conversation, analyzation, and examination I, and it is likely many others, realize most people are not truly comfortable with their faith, belief, and reasoning of many things. While pondering upon the subject of others low faiths I realized a lot of people give up at certain points of their own thought and distract themselves with their daily routine, and sometimes escape from the harder questions by hiding behind religion, texts, or even science. If they do not agree or have low faith in a part of their own philosophy why do they not find a better fitting solution? Laziness coupled with doubt in oneself can be more powerful than fear and doubt of others. Dealing with my own disbelief, I set out to logically define certain specific aspects of my life, first through understanding the physical world around me with calculations and theories, then stemmed from theories and calculations to broader equations, solutions, and eventually combinations of popular beliefs and myths. What I came up with was a malleable yet unbreakable confidence in my current philosophy. Yes, I will debate my point of view, but I mainly learn new things from listening to those who have something interesting and well thought out to say. You may have noticed I have not said anything that specifies a category that signifies I am part of one ideal or another, that is because I do not like to limit myself, and for the most part all those summed-up generalizations do not matter when actually pondering existence in itself.


I will not try to argue anything I think I know. I am simply going to create a process for which people can create logical and rational explanations of every greatly pondered question they come up with. If I somehow stir up enough interest in this process, I will create a system inside a forum for which everyone can debate with anyone upon any of the debate topics and create their own version of a confidently unbreakable yet malleable philosophy, or enhance and oil the ones they might have already obtained. And if interest calls for it, I will also produce a system for which the more or most well reasoned arguments and logic works it way to more general, easily accessible, communitive postings on the main page where everyone is directed from. This order of arguments will almost generalize the thinking of the community as a whole and represent what we can come up with out of our own will and dedication of deduction.

Another goal of mine is to include some of the most innovative and respected minds available. Among these well-respected minds I also have a goal of hearing the thoughts of many religious figures to further enhance the future community's philosophies. As religion populates the world powerful myths become facts, spiritual interpretations become centralized, ceremonial liturgies become routine. With a working philosophy, and contribution from anybody who truly works with it, powerful myths can be created from fact, many spiritual interpretations can be summoned from one centralized idea, ceremonial liturgies can be meaningful through routine devotion of thought.

So, what will it be? Will you cast this blog, this communication, this idea into a category labeled in your mind as "indifferent", "too much work", or "uninteresting" as you close the browser window and move onto a new page? Or will you accept this challenge and begin and renew your examination of the world around you, share your experiences with others so that a more accurate perception can be created, simply enhance your thought and philosophy just by pondering solutions as others voraciously debate morals, logic, and existence as it presents itself? (Sorry- you can't take full advantage of this option until I have been presented with enough information to determine there is enough interest in creating a forum and online community for it. At the moment readers of the blog may leave comments and/or contact me through email if they wish to share their ideas. I will try to incorporate a question, comment, concern or two brought to me through comments or emails into the main part of the blog until another step in the process is made.)

Whenever you ask a question about anything, think vertically. Does the solution or answer matter, or can you find a solution that covers more than just that of which you ponder? I do not claim to know anything as truth- just to live out life by what presents itself to be true, at the moment of my thought.

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

ad rem: "to the matter"

Candy Bar Causality

When I was a little kid, the exact age I cannot remember, my brothers found a king size candy bar and were fighting over who's it was. It was the day after Halloween and they had their candy all over the table for trading. The fighting and verbal nettling lasted about two hours when they turned around and each went for the candy bar, only, the candy bar was no longer there. They each were so intensely testifying and threatening over whose it was that I had just come up and ate it, problem solved. Actually, not from my recollection, but it seems reasonable knowing how I think that I may have actually ate one of two candy bars and forgot about it. When they were arguing I figured that just taking the last candy bar left would not only solve their problem, but I would also acquire an extra candy bar in the process.

In today’s world, or in any time in any place, it is too easy to forget about the point of our actions and get too caught up in proving to others we are not wrong, not weak, not incompetent. In this example, both of my brothers were so focused in proving themselves right that they forgot about the whole reason they started the argument, to obtain the candy bar that was rightfully theirs. Sure, neither one could have just taken the candy bar, but neither one left room into their mind to believe that they both could be right or both are wrong. Because of each one's limited point of view and ineffective thought process, I obtained the candy bar. Although my morals were not as developed as they could have been in this situation, I knew what I wanted and took the correct, logical initiative to obtain it.

In many conversations, I have witnessed numerous results of different styles of verbalization and communication. I have noted to myself that even if one's opinion or thought is more correct or even fact, the other person's opinion or fact could be just as right or even more correct than the first person's argument or thought. To try and find out what is right is better than trying to persuade others you are right. If one tries to search for the truest truth then one will find a wider perspective on thoughts, and therefore obtain a wider consciousness of what is happening in one's surrounding environment. Applying this method of thinking to real life situations exercises one's mind into looking for outside factors, such as sneaky little brothers, when searching for a solution.


Does the solution or answer matter, or can you find a solution that covers more than just that of which you ponder? I do not claim to know anything as truth- just to live out life by what presents itself to be true, at the moment of my thought.

Monday, February 11, 2008

ab uno disce omnes: "from one, learn all"

Due to the facts that it takes a noticeable amount of time before people can successfully find blogs, I will proceed with a monologue until I have found, if I find, some visitors to leave topics of conversation and thought, or even comments on what I have written. To start, I will create a review for any and every worthy book I a read and analyzed that relates to the topic of conversation. If, with a little luck, a stream of consciousness is sustained, then I shall right whatever I am thinking in as much logical order as I can possibly withstand until my thought is vaporized. Once I have written a descent amount on the subject I will restate anything that has been concluded through a logical sequence and move on to my next subject, whatever it may be. In future posts I will be glad to answer any questions or comments, but at the moment I have no idea where to start. So, for now anyway, the topic of conversation will be... Candy Bar Causality. In my next post, I shall reveal to the readers of this blog the causality associated with "candy bars" and how I experienced this connection during my youth. Then again, if we are living then aren't we relatively youthful at this very moment, especially if life is only one part of our existence?